For reference only · always refer to official disclosures from insurers and regulators.
PROPOSAL ANALYSIS

Reading a benefit illustration

The benefit illustration is the single most important document for understanding a policy. This page breaks it into readable blocks and adds an IRR calculator.

The cash flows and figures below are illustrative examples used to demonstrate the reading method. They do not represent the pricing or returns of any real product.

STRUCTURE

What is in a benefit illustration

A Hong Kong dividend policy illustration usually contains the following sections. Reading them block by block is more efficient than reading front to back.

01

Policy and applicant details

Insured's age, sex and smoking status, policy currency, premium term and annual premium — these variables determine every number that follows.

02

Coverage description

Death benefit, critical illness payouts, riders and exclusions — what is covered and what is not.

03

Premiums and payment

Premium term, payment method, the insurance levy, any discount or rebate, and the consequences of missing a payment.

04

Cash value illustration

Guaranteed cash value, accumulated dividends and surrender value shown by policy year — the core table for judging returns.

05

Scenario illustrations

Regulators require illustrations under different investment scenarios, which show the range of the non-guaranteed element.

06

Important notices

Cooling-off period, surrender arrangements, dividend policy, currency risk and customer notices — the most overlooked and most important part.

CASH VALUE

Cash value illustration (example)

The surrender value at year 20 is a common mid-term checkpoint. Note that surrendering early usually means a significant loss against premiums paid.

Policy yearCumulative premiumsGuaranteed cash valueNon-guaranteed dividend valueTotal surrender value
1100,00018,00042,00060,000
3300,00062,000138,000200,000
5500,000118,000272,000390,000
10500,000268,000592,000860,000
15500,000420,0001,030,0001,450,000
20500,000596,0001,684,0002,280,000
30500,000960,0003,420,0004,380,000

Amounts in illustrative RMB-equivalent terms. Guaranteed cash value and non-guaranteed dividend value should be assessed separately: the first is certain, the second moves with investment performance.

IRR CALCULATOR

Internal rate of return (IRR)

Converting 'annual premium + premium term + surrender value in a given year' into an annualised return is the most direct way to compare plans.

—Annualised IRR
—Total premiums paid
—Surrender value that year
—×Value ÷ premiums paid
Guaranteed vs non-guaranteedTry the same calculation with the non-guaranteed part discounted

IRR is derived by discounting the cash flows. The result is indicative and excludes the insurance levy, currency movements and tax effects.

GAP CHECK

Review your existing cover

Enter the cover you already hold. The tool sizes three long-term needs — critical illness, education and retirement — and compares them with what you have.

This is a rough sizing exercise only: no product recommendations, no judgement on the quality of any policy, and no insurance advice. Everything is calculated in your browser — nothing you type is uploaded or stored.

Critical illness cover

Whether the sum assured can replace income and clear debts during treatment and recovery.

Education fund

What you still need to put aside each year, given the target and the years left.

Retirement fund

The distance between lifetime retirement spending and what you have set aside.

Fill in the figures above, then choose “Run the check” to see the result.

Critical illness cover

—Broadly sufficientSmall shortfallClear shortfallLarge shortfallCheck your inputs
ShortfallFully covered¥—
Suggested cover
¥—
Cover you hold
¥—
Cover ratio
—

Your cover already meets the suggested amount. The next step is not more cover but a closer look at scope: illness definitions, the number of payouts and the waiting period between them decide whether a claim is paid at all.

A small shortfall. A rider or an increase to the existing policy is usually enough — there is no need to take out a second main plan for this.

A clear shortfall. Bring cover up to three to five years of income plus outstanding debt first, then consider whether to spread the cover across a second insurer.

Your cover is well below the suggested amount. A critical illness tends to cut income and add debt pressure at the same time, so closing this gap deserves priority over any new savings plan.

Please check the figures: amounts should be positive, and the ages need room to work with (life expectancy above the planned retirement age, child's age below 18).

Suggested cover = annual income × multiple + outstanding debt. Three to five years of income is a common benchmark; the longer the period, the better it covers a long recovery away from work.

Education fund

—Broadly sufficientSmall shortfallClear shortfallLarge shortfallCheck your inputs
ShortfallFully covered¥—

Equivalent annual saving ¥—

Target fund
¥—
Saved so far
¥—
Cover ratio
—

Your savings already cover the target. The remaining task is to hold the money somewhere whose term matches the purpose, so it is not diverted along the way.

A small shortfall. A regular contribution of the annual amount shown is enough; there is no need to catch up in one go.

A clear shortfall. Turn the annual figure into a standing commitment — the earlier you start, the smaller each year's contribution needs to be.

A large shortfall against a deadline that is not far away, so closing it in a single year would be a stretch. Split the target into “essential” and “optional” tiers and fund the essential part first.

Please check the figures: amounts should be positive, and the ages need room to work with (life expectancy above the planned retirement age, child's age below 18).

Shortfall = target fund − savings to date, spread over the years remaining before university entry to give the amount to set aside each year.

Retirement fund

—Broadly sufficientSmall shortfallClear shortfallLarge shortfallCheck your inputs
ShortfallFully covered¥—

Equivalent annual saving ¥—

Fund required
¥—
Saved so far
¥—
Cover ratio
—

Your savings already cover the amount this method calls for. It is worth re-checking the spending assumption once more — understating retirement spending is the most common source of error here.

A small shortfall. Keep contributing the annual amount shown. Discipline matters more than chasing a higher return.

A clear shortfall. Match the tools to the horizon: more than twenty years to retirement can carry some volatility; under ten years should lean towards stability.

A large shortfall. Separate “the essentials” from “the life you would like” and secure the funding for the essentials first.

Please check the figures: amounts should be positive, and the ages need room to work with (life expectancy above the planned retirement age, child's age below 18).

Fund required = monthly spending in retirement × 12 × (life expectancy − retirement age). This funds the whole of retirement spending without crediting the returns the capital would still earn.

All three figures are calculated in today's money, with no inflation rate and no investment return assumed. That cuts both ways: the retirement figure covers spending in full without crediting the returns the capital would still earn after retirement, so it reads high; the education figure ignores fee inflation, so it reads low. Treat the output as an order of magnitude, not an actuarial result.

PITFALLS

Six common mistakes

Looking only at the year-20 figure
Look at the whole value curve: when it breaks even, how much is lost on surrender in the first five years, and whether growth accelerates later. All of that carries more information than a single point.
Treating the non-guaranteed dividend as certain
The non-guaranteed element in an illustration moves with investment performance. Check it against the insurer's fulfilment ratio history for similar plans.
Ignoring currency risk
For a policy denominated in a foreign currency, the value you actually receive is affected by exchange rates. If you will spend in another currency, factor that in.
Confusing the guaranteed break-even year with the total break-even year
The two can differ by several years. The former is more conservative and reliable; the latter depends on dividend payouts. Use both for long-term planning.
Overlooking the cost of early surrender
In the first few years the surrender value can be less than half the premiums paid, or worse. Confirm you can lock the money away before applying.
Forgetting to check the exclusions
For protection products, exclusions determine whether a claim will actually be paid — particularly pre-existing conditions and the definitions of specific illnesses.